IMPRUDENT JURISPRUDENCE? HUMAN RIGHTS AND MORAL CONTINGENCY

Oliver O'Donovan is mistaken to think that subjective rights are irredeemably bound up with Hobbesian individualism, but correct to criticize their abstraction from deliberation about a wider range of moral considerations. As Grotius's thinking shows, the existence of a natural, moral righ...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:SYMPOSIUM: CHRISTIANITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Main Author: Biggar, Nigel 1955- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [2015]
In: Journal of law and religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 30, Issue: 3, Pages: 391-401
Further subjects:B Prudence
B subjective rights
B social costs
B Torture
B objective right
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1666340472
003 DE-627
005 20190527144624.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190527s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/jlr.2015.23  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1666340472 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1666340472 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1024413861  |0 (DE-627)719836816  |0 (DE-576)164195920  |4 aut  |a Biggar, Nigel  |d 1955- 
109 |a Biggar, Nigel 1955- 
245 1 0 |a IMPRUDENT JURISPRUDENCE? HUMAN RIGHTS AND MORAL CONTINGENCY  |c Nigel Biggar 
246 1 |i Rubrikentitel  |a SYMPOSIUM: CHRISTIANITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS 
264 1 |c [2015] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Oliver O'Donovan is mistaken to think that subjective rights are irredeemably bound up with Hobbesian individualism, but correct to criticize their abstraction from deliberation about a wider range of moral considerations. As Grotius's thinking shows, the existence of a natural, moral right against physical harm depends on the contingent presence or absence of morally significant circumstances. There is, however, an important distinction between natural moral rights outside a particular, effective legal system and positive rights granted by such a system. Positive rights are less contingent and more stable, because society thinks it prudent to bear the social costs of that stability. Take, for example, the positive right against torture. This is not based simply on the intrinsic evil of what is done to the tortured. It is based partly on the intrinsic evil of the sadistic motive of the torturer. However, this motive obtains only in some cases, not others. Let us distinguish the latter as cases of "aggressive interrogation." There might be instances of such interrogation that are conscientious and morally justified, all considerations of social cost and risk apart. There is, therefore, no natural moral right against it. Nonetheless, its general legal prohibition under a positive right against torture is justified by the prudential judgment that any possible momentary advantages to national security are outweighed by the high risk of social and institutional corruption and its political costs. That said, extraordinary circumstances might still justify-morally-the rare violation of the positive, legal right. 
650 4 |a objective right 
650 4 |a Prudence 
650 4 |a social costs 
650 4 |a subjective rights 
650 4 |a Torture 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of law and religion  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983  |g 30(2015), 3, Seite 391-401  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)461908581  |w (DE-600)2164472-X  |w (DE-576)273875132  |x 2163-3088  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2015  |g number:3  |g pages:391-401 
856 |u https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:fcdb4f5a-2c97-446a-a42a-f084ed90e691/files/mb012847306a565cf9cdcada251c6edfd  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/imprudent-jurisprudence-human-rights-and-moral-contingency/A70EF8D249B14DB43CCA0E342AA3841F  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2015.23  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3479797563 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1666340472 
LOK |0 005 20190527132025 
LOK |0 008 190527||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL