INDIVIDUAL CONSCIENCE AND HOW IT SHOULD BE TREATED
This essay summarizes crucial ways that society-in particular, the United States-has treated claims by individuals to be free of generally required duties because their convictions tell them that performing the duties is deeply wrong. Among the topics I address are how the Supreme Court decisions in...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | ; ; |
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2016]
|
In: |
Journal of law and religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 31, Issue: 3, Pages: 306-320 |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1666357553 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20190527171051.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190527s2016 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/jlr.2016.40 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1666357553 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1666357553 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)132914913 |0 (DE-627)528673408 |0 (DE-576)164266364 |4 aut |a Greenawalt, Kent |d 1936- | |
109 | |a Greenawalt, Kent 1936- |a Greenawalt, Robert K. 1936- |a Greenawalt, R. Kent 1936- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a INDIVIDUAL CONSCIENCE AND HOW IT SHOULD BE TREATED |c Kent Greenawalt |
264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This essay summarizes crucial ways that society-in particular, the United States-has treated claims by individuals to be free of generally required duties because their convictions tell them that performing the duties is deeply wrong. Among the topics I address are how the Supreme Court decisions involving constitutional rights and organizational claims relate to this treatment, but my main focus is on what I see as the critical issues and what I believe to be the wise choices for addressing such claims. Without attempting an extensive account of all that has been written on claims of exemptions, I refer to some relatively recent books that can help one to understand what is at stake and what can be said in favor of competing positions. I also provide references to recent and forthcoming work of my own that explores claims of exemptions in greater depth. | ||
601 | |a Individuation | ||
655 | 7 | |a Rezension |0 (DE-588)4049712-4 |0 (DE-627)106186019 |0 (DE-576)209083166 |2 gnd-content | |
700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |0 (DE-588)139277242 |0 (DE-627)703274198 |0 (DE-576)310995310 |4 ant |a Smith, Steven Douglas | |
700 | 1 | |a Waldron, Mary Anne |d 1948- |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |4 ant | |
700 | 1 | |a Krason, Stephen M. |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |4 ant | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of law and religion |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983 |g 31(2016), 3, Seite 306-320 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)461908581 |w (DE-600)2164472-X |w (DE-576)273875132 |x 2163-3088 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g pages:306-320 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/individual-conscience-and-how-it-should-be-treated/F00F57A959C44028F6E0CB8554438536 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2016.40 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3479838049 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1666357553 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20190527170507 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190527||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixrz |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |