Measuring Religiousness in Health Research: Review and Critique

Although existing measures of religiousness are sophisticated, no single approach has yet emerged as a standard. We review the measures of religiousness most commonly used in the religion and health literature with particular attention to their limitations, suggesting that vigilance is required to a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Hall, Daniel E. (Author) ; Meador, Keith G. (Author) ; Koenig, Harold G. 1951- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V. [2008]
In: Journal of religion and health
Year: 2008, Volume: 47, Issue: 2, Pages: 134-163
Further subjects:B Measurement
B Spirituality
B Worldview
B Religiousness
B Philosophy
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 166885600X
003 DE-627
005 20190709155258.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190709s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10943-008-9165-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)166885600X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP166885600X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hall, Daniel E.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Hall, Daniel E. 
245 1 0 |a Measuring Religiousness in Health Research  |b Review and Critique  |c Daniel E. Hall 
264 1 |c [2008] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Although existing measures of religiousness are sophisticated, no single approach has yet emerged as a standard. We review the measures of religiousness most commonly used in the religion and health literature with particular attention to their limitations, suggesting that vigilance is required to avoid over-generalization. After placing the development of these scales in historical context, we discuss measures of religious attendance, private religious practice, and intrinsic/extrinsic religious motivation. We also discuss measures of religious coping, wellbeing, belief, affiliation, maturity, history, and experience. We also address the current trend in favor of multi-dimensional and functional measures of religiousness. We conclude with a critique of the standard, "context-free" approach aimed at measuring "religiousness-in-general", suggesting that future work might more fruitfully focus on developing ways to measure religiousness in specific, theologically relevant contexts. 
650 4 |a Measurement 
650 4 |a Philosophy 
650 4 |a Religiousness 
650 4 |a Spirituality 
650 4 |a Worldview 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1147169586  |0 (DE-627)1008531154  |0 (DE-576)421097930  |4 aut  |a Meador, Keith G. 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)130071935  |0 (DE-627)48961700X  |0 (DE-576)175163626  |4 aut  |a Koenig, Harold G.  |d 1951- 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religion and health  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 1961  |g 47(2008), 2, Seite 134-163  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320578089  |w (DE-600)2017250-3  |w (DE-576)121466191  |x 1573-6571  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:47  |g year:2008  |g number:2  |g pages:134-163 
856 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823950  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via pmcid lookup)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-008-9165-2  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3492272894 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 166885600X 
LOK |0 005 20190709155258 
LOK |0 008 190709||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL