Trust, autonomy, and advance directives
Trust has been largely ignored in contemporary bioethical discussions and also by courts of law. The favored language of autonomy, privacy, and rights is useful but insufficient to speak to moral experience, especially the experience of persons who write advance directives, but also physicians who r...
| Publié dans: | Journal of religion and health |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V.
[1989]
|
| Dans: |
Journal of religion and health
Année: 1989, Volume: 28, Numéro: 3, Pages: 175-183 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Central Place
B Advance Directive B Moral Experience B Salient Feature B Bioethical Discussion |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | Trust has been largely ignored in contemporary bioethical discussions and also by courts of law. The favored language of autonomy, privacy, and rights is useful but insufficient to speak to moral experience, especially the experience of persons who write advance directives, but also physicians who receive such directives. The Brophy case is analyzed for its salient features, and a more central place for the concept of trust is proposed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-6571 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF00987749 |