In defense of monotheistic father religion
Many questions are currently being raised, by women especially, regarding the religious, social, and psychological effects of the emphasis on God as father in Western religion. Viewed in the light of key insights from developmental psychoanalysis, patriarchal monotheism does indeed seem to confront...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V.
[1982]
|
In: |
Journal of religion and health
Year: 1982, Volume: 21, Issue: 1, Pages: 62-67 |
Further subjects: | B
Symbolic Configuration
B Western Religion B Psychological Effect B Religious Reality |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1669166376 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20190715145927.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190715s1982 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF02273895 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1669166376 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1669166376 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)125565143 |0 (DE-627)706827767 |0 (DE-576)295094273 |4 aut |a Miller, John W. |d 1926-2017 | |
109 | |a Miller, John W. 1926-2017 |a Miller, John Wolf 1926-2017 |a Miller, J. W. 1926-2017 | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a In defense of monotheistic father religion |c John W. Miller |
264 | 1 | |c [1982] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Many questions are currently being raised, by women especially, regarding the religious, social, and psychological effects of the emphasis on God as father in Western religion. Viewed in the light of key insights from developmental psychoanalysis, patriarchal monotheism does indeed seem to confront us with a dilemma. However, a resolution of this dilemma does not appear to lie in a move toward androgyny or matriarchy. Evaluated from the point of view of its overall capacity to mediate a meaningful, unified, personal religious reality to both sexes, monotheistic father religion is still the preferable ultimate symbolic configuration. | ||
601 | |a Religion | ||
650 | 4 | |a Psychological Effect | |
650 | 4 | |a Religious Reality | |
650 | 4 | |a Symbolic Configuration | |
650 | 4 | |a Western Religion | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religion and health |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 1961 |g 21(1982), 1, Seite 62-67 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320578089 |w (DE-600)2017250-3 |w (DE-576)121466191 |x 1573-6571 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:1982 |g number:1 |g pages:62-67 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02273895 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3493410395 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1669166376 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20190715144437 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190715||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REF | |a Religiöses Symbol | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |