Ritual Criticism And Reflexivity In Fieldwork

One view of ritual is that it is pre-critical, if not pre-rational, thus implying that criticism has no place in the inner circle of ritual enactment. To the contrary, I argue that ritual traditions typically involve the exercise of critical judgment, and therefore there is little point in scholars...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ritual studies
1. VerfasserIn: Grimes, Ronald L. 1943- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Druck Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Dep. [1988]
In: Journal of ritual studies
Jahr: 1988, Band: 2, Heft: 2, Seiten: 217-239
weitere Schlagwörter:B Religious rituals
B Bharathanatyam
B Performing artists
B Dance dramas
B Anthropology of religion
B Religious dances
B Performing arts events
Online Zugang: Volltext (Verlag)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:One view of ritual is that it is pre-critical, if not pre-rational, thus implying that criticism has no place in the inner circle of ritual enactment. To the contrary, I argue that ritual traditions typically involve the exercise of critical judgment, and therefore there is little point in scholars avoiding it. Ritual criticism is the act of making judgments about rites, and its exercise, especially by observers in cross-cultural contexts, is potentially laden with conflict. My aim is to reflect on some of the problems of engaging in criticism outside the context of one's own traditions. To this end I use a specific example, that of a classical Indian dance performance, and subject it to criticism in order to formulate and refine the critic's task.
ISSN:0890-1112
Bezug:Kritik in "A Rumor Is Afield (1988)"
Kritik in "In, Out, And In-Between (1988)"
Enthält:Enthalten in: Journal of ritual studies