Archaeology and Celtic Myth: Some Points of Comparison and Convergence
This article arises from a plenary invitation to compare myth and archaeology in the context of Celtic-speaking cultures. Approaches to myth in this context have undergone significant reassessment in the light of revisionist approaches to definitions of native' culture and Celtic' identi...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
[publisher not identified]
[2019]
|
Dans: |
Temenos
Année: 2019, Volume: 55, Numéro: 1, Pages: 9-28 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Celts
/ Myth
/ Archaeology
/ Findings
|
RelBib Classification: | AF Géographie religieuse AG Vie religieuse BD Religions européennes anciennes HH Archéologie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Narratives
B archaeological thought B Celtic identity B Nativism |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Résumé: | This article arises from a plenary invitation to compare myth and archaeology in the context of Celtic-speaking cultures. Approaches to myth in this context have undergone significant reassessment in the light of revisionist approaches to definitions of native' culture and Celtic' identity. These reassessments have implications for comparisons that are made between archaeological evidence and narratives, or elements thereof, that are arguably identifiable as mythic. New approaches to data in both subject areas affect roles that have long been played by myth in public reception of archaeological discoveries and in supporting cultural identities. Past approaches to such comparisons inspire caution, even scepticism, but some critical use of myth as an idea can be seen as productive - for example, in questioning conservative interpretations of textual or material data. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2342-7256 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Temenos
|