A Psychoanalytic Response to Hood
As a complement to Hood's argument, it is emphasized that a Freudian critique of religion can be offered only within an experience of delusion because illusion is identified from reality, within faith. Hood's article offers a pertinent commentary on the issues that Freud addressed in apply...
| Published in: | The international journal for the psychology of religion |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[1992]
|
| In: |
The international journal for the psychology of religion
Year: 1992, Volume: 2, Issue: 3, Pages: 161-164 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1669646971 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190723162851.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190723s1992 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0203_2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1669646971 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1669646971 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1173137033 |0 (DE-627)1042278415 |0 (DE-576)515031968 |4 aut |a Shafranske, Edward P. | |
| 109 | |a Shafranske, Edward P. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Psychoanalytic Response to Hood |c Edward P. Shafranske |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1992] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a As a complement to Hood's argument, it is emphasized that a Freudian critique of religion can be offered only within an experience of delusion because illusion is identified from reality, within faith. Hood's article offers a pertinent commentary on the issues that Freud addressed in applying psychoanalysis to the study of religion. In his discussion of the distinction between illusion and delusion, Hood draws attention to the essence of Freud's critique of religion. Freud's aim, one gleans throughout Hood's article, was less an attempt to illustrate the role of projection in the religious experience of individuals than it was an emboldened assay at the religious underpinnings of civilization. We may recall that, for Freud (1933/1964), religion alone was to be taken seriously as the enemy (p. 160). As such, Hood locates Freud's Contributions primarily within the context of an applied social psychology or socioanalysis. This placement distinguishes Freud from contemporary psychologists of religion, whose inquiries tend to fixate on the more limited analyses of individual religiosity. | ||
| 601 | |a Psychoanalytiker | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The international journal for the psychology of religion |d New York, NY : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1991 |g 2(1992), 3, Seite 161-164 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320614204 |w (DE-600)2021761-4 |w (DE-576)255101619 |x 1532-7582 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:1992 |g number:3 |g pages:161-164 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Hood, Ralph W., 1942 - |t Mysticism, Reality, Illusion, and the Freudian Critique of Religion |d 1992 |w (DE-627)1669646963 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0203_2 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 2 |j 1992 |e 3 |h 161-164 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3495872175 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1669646971 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190723145224 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||