History as a Canceled Problem? Hilbert Lists, du Bois-Reymond's Enigmas, and the Scientific Study of Religion

The present article reviews the identification of “Hilbert Problems” in the scientific study of religion as presented in a call for papers and a subsequent special issue of Religion, Brain & Behavior (2015; 2017). Specific attention is herein devoted to some overlooked epistemological and method...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Ambasciano, Leonardo (Auteur) ; Coleman, Thomas J (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Oxford University Press [2019]
Dans: Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Année: 2019, Volume: 87, Numéro: 2, Pages: 366-400
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Du Bois-Reymond, Paul 1831-1889 / Mathematisches Problem / Hilbert, David 1862-1943 / Historiographie / Science cognitive / Science des religions
RelBib Classification:AA Sciences des religions
AB Philosophie de la religion
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:The present article reviews the identification of “Hilbert Problems” in the scientific study of religion as presented in a call for papers and a subsequent special issue of Religion, Brain & Behavior (2015; 2017). Specific attention is herein devoted to some overlooked epistemological and methodological issues, that is, mathematical Platonism and presentism. Most importantly, notwithstanding the advances produced by the recent experimental turn in the cognitive science of religion, this paper recognizes the existence of a “historical problem” in the field, that is, a belittling or neglect of historiography and nonmathematical sciences. Since most of such biases are also embedded in the original Hilbert Problems, a historiographical reanalysis of the cultural context in which the Hilbert Problems were advanced is provided. Finally, the paper proposes a list of themes in urgent need of a reappraisal and argues for a sustained multi-disciplinary collaboration with the ultimate aim to promote cross-disciplinary integration.
ISSN:1477-4585
Contient:Enthalten in: American Academy of Religion, Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfz001