Sharon Street's unsuccessful argument against theism
Sharon Street has argued that we should reject theism because we can accept it only at the cost of having good reason to doubt the reliability of our judgments as to what moral reasons there are. The success of her argument depends on the assumption that no realist account of normative reasons that...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
[2019]
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 86, Issue: 1, Pages: 17-24 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Street, Sharon 1973-
/ Theism
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
| Further subjects: | B
problem of evil
B Argument against theism B Sharon Street |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1670230562 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200831181205.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190730s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-018-9696-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1670230562 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1670230562 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pegan, Philip |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sharon Street's unsuccessful argument against theism |c Philip Pegan |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Sharon Street has argued that we should reject theism because we can accept it only at the cost of having good reason to doubt the reliability of our judgments as to what moral reasons there are. The success of her argument depends on the assumption that no realist account of normative reasons that validates commonsense morality has a tenable secular epistemology. I argue that even given this (obviously contentious) assumption Street's argument does not succeed. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Argument against theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a problem of evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sharon Street | |
| 652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)1216849889 |0 (DE-627)1728106729 |2 gnd |a Street, Sharon |d 1973- |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 86(2019), 1, Seite 17-24 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:86 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:17-24 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9696-8 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3500829988 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1670230562 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200826164554 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190730||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Theism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Théisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Teísmo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Teismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 有神论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 有神論 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Teísmo |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Теизм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θεϊσμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||