Compassion for Living Creatures in Indian Law Courts
The Constitution of India through an amendment of 1976 prescribes a Fundamental Duty 'to have compassion for living creatures'. The use of this notion in actual legal practice, gathered from various judgments, provides a glimpse of the current debates in India that address the relationship...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
MDPI
[2019]
|
In: |
Religions
Year: 2019, Volume: 10, Issue: 6, Pages: 1-21 |
Further subjects: | B
Buddhism
B Compassion B Animal welfare B court cases B India |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | The Constitution of India through an amendment of 1976 prescribes a Fundamental Duty 'to have compassion for living creatures'. The use of this notion in actual legal practice, gathered from various judgments, provides a glimpse of the current debates in India that address the relationships between humans and animals. Judgments explicitly mentioning 'compassion' cover diverse issues, concerning stray dogs, trespassing cattle, birds in cages, bull races, cart-horses, animal sacrifice, etc. They often juxtapose a discourse on compassion as an emotional and moral attitude, and a discourse about legal rights, essentially the right not to suffer unnecessary pain at the hands of humans (according to formulae that bear the imprint of British utilitarianism). In these judgments, various religious founding figures such as the Buddha, Mahavira, etc., are paid due tribute, perhaps not so much in reference to their religion, but rather as historical icons-on the same footing as Mahatma Gandhi-of an idealized intrinsic Indian compassion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2077-1444 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Religions
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3390/rel10060383 |