Skeptical Theism and Morriston's Humean Argument from Evil

There's a growing sense among philosophers of religion that (i) Humean arguments from evil are some of the most formidable arguments against theism, and (ii) skeptical theism fails to undermine those arguments because they fail to make the inferences skeptical theists criticize. In line with th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sophia
Main Author: Perrine, Timothy (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands [2019]
In: Sophia
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B Wes Morriston
B Humean argument from evil
B Skeptical theism
B Offsetting objection
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1671596609
003 DE-627
005 20200701115838.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190819s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11841-018-0656-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1671596609 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1671596609 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Perrine, Timothy  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Skeptical Theism and Morriston's Humean Argument from Evil  |c Timothy Perrine 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a There's a growing sense among philosophers of religion that (i) Humean arguments from evil are some of the most formidable arguments against theism, and (ii) skeptical theism fails to undermine those arguments because they fail to make the inferences skeptical theists criticize. In line with this trend, Wes Morriston has recently formulated a Humean argument from evil, and his chief defense of it is that skeptical theism is irrelevant to it. Here I argue that skeptical theism is relevant to Humean arguments. To do this, I reveal the common structure of skeptical theism's critiques. Seeing the common structure reveals why some versions of skeptical theism are irrelevant to Humean arguments from evil. It also points the way forward to formulating a relevant version. By combining skeptical theism with a plausible principle concerning reasonable belief, I formulate a version of skeptical theism that undermines Morriston's argument that is also immune from his objections. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Humean argument from evil 
650 4 |a Offsetting objection 
650 4 |a Skeptical theism 
650 4 |a Wes Morriston 
652 |a AB:NBC 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 58(2019), 2, Seite 115-135  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:58  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:115-135 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/PERSTA-7.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-018-0656-7  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 58  |j 2019  |e 2  |h 115-135 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3507544253 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1671596609 
LOK |0 005 20200701115838 
LOK |0 008 190819||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL