Responding to N.T. Wright's Rejection of the Soul
At a 2011 meeting of the Society of Christian Philosophers, N. T. Wright offered four reasons for rejecting the existence of soul. This was surprising, as many Christian philosophers had previously taken Wright's defense of a disembodied intermediate state as a defense of a substance dualist vi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2018]
|
In: |
Heythrop journal
Year: 2018, Volume: 59, Issue: 2, Pages: 201-220 |
RelBib Classification: | HC New Testament KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NBE Anthropology NBQ Eschatology VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1671662237 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220308104847.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190820s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/heyj.12341 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1671662237 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1671662237 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Rickabaugh, Brandon L. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Responding to N.T. Wright's Rejection of the Soul |c Brandon L. Rickabaugh |
264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a At a 2011 meeting of the Society of Christian Philosophers, N. T. Wright offered four reasons for rejecting the existence of soul. This was surprising, as many Christian philosophers had previously taken Wright's defense of a disembodied intermediate state as a defense of a substance dualist view of the soul. In this paper, I offer responses to each of Wright's objections, demonstrating that Wright's arguments fail to undermine substance dualism. In so doing, I expose how popular arguments against dualism fail, such as (1) dualism is merely an unwarranted influence of Greek culture on Christianity, and (2) substance dualism is merely a soul-of-the-gaps hypothesis. Moreover, I demonstrate that Wright himself has offered a powerful reason for adopting substance dualism in his previous works. In conclusion I offer a view that explains why the human soul needs a resurrected body. | ||
652 | |a HC:KAJ:NBE:NBQ:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Heythrop journal |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960 |g 59(2018), 2, Seite 201-220 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320573052 |w (DE-600)2016721-0 |w (DE-576)094425485 |x 1468-2265 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2018 |g number:2 |g pages:201-220 |
856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/RICRTN.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/heyj.12341 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.12341 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
BIB | |a 1 | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3507716216 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1671662237 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220308104836 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044640 |a KAJ | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044136 |a HC | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052449 |a NBQ | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a BIB |a REL |