George Lindbeck as a Potential Religious Pluralist
Interreligious dialogue and conversion are two contentious foci for understanding how religion operates. An interpretation of George Lindbeck serves as a starting point for discussion in this paper. The dominant reading is that Lindbeck claims that traditions absorb the world. Religious traditions a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| In: |
Heythrop journal
Year: 2019, Volume: 60, Issue: 3, Pages: 368-382 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AX Inter-religious relations CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NAB Fundamental theology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 167167037X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409124751.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190820s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/heyj.12136 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)167167037X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP167167037X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)139156542 |0 (DE-627)608619914 |0 (DE-576)281036365 |4 aut |a Fridlund, Patrik |d 1964- | |
| 109 | |a Fridlund, Patrik 1964- |a Fridlund, Patrick 1964- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a George Lindbeck as a Potential Religious Pluralist |c Patrik Fridlund |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Interreligious dialogue and conversion are two contentious foci for understanding how religion operates. An interpretation of George Lindbeck serves as a starting point for discussion in this paper. The dominant reading is that Lindbeck claims that traditions absorb the world. Religious traditions are isolated, and the one with a greater capacity to assimilate others' concerns emerges the strongest - implying what is called exclusivism. My proposal is that a different reading of Lindbeck is possible; I am not so much questioning Lindbeck as highlighting another aspect of his oeuvre. If grammar, framework and structure - and not propositional first-order ontological contents - are given first place, dialogue and conversion appear differently. Questions must be raised, however; isn't it true that there is always some content and substance - even if hidden or disguised? | ||
| 652 | |a AB:AX:CC:KAJ:NAB | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Heythrop journal |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960 |g 60(2019), 3, Seite 368-382 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320573052 |w (DE-600)2016721-0 |w (DE-576)094425485 |x 1468-2265 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:60 |g year:2019 |g number:3 |g pages:368-382 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/heyj.12136 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.12136 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3507737817 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 167167037X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210812112011 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044640 |a KAJ | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043253 |a AX | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043806 |a CC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442050926 |a NAB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||