Donatism of History: Recent Questions
Two roads diverged in Roman Africa. One led to the movement that came to be known as Donatism, and the other to the so-called Catholic party. The controversy emerged soon after the Diocletian persecution, one side selecting Caecilius as the bishop of Carthage, the other eventually selecting Donatus...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2019]
|
| In: |
The journal of ecclesiastical history
Year: 2019, Volume: 70, Issue: 3, Pages: 565-569 |
| Review of: | The donatist schism (Liverpool : Liverpool University Press, 2016) (Wilhite, David E.)
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Donatism
/ Schism
/ History
|
| RelBib Classification: | KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity KBN Sub-Saharan Africa KDH Christian sects |
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 167173520X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409124736.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190821s2019 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0022046918000702 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)167173520X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP167173520X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)106402288X |0 (DE-627)812869125 |0 (DE-576)264491300 |4 aut |a Wilhite, David E. | |
| 109 | |a Wilhite, David E. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Donatism of History |b Recent Questions |c David E. Wilhite |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Two roads diverged in Roman Africa. One led to the movement that came to be known as Donatism, and the other to the so-called Catholic party. The controversy emerged soon after the Diocletian persecution, one side selecting Caecilius as the bishop of Carthage, the other eventually selecting Donatus (and therefore dubbed 'Donatist'). The schism widened when Constantine supported the former and attempted to enforce his party's status. Violence sporadically erupted between these two parties for the next century, around which time Augustine led the charge to bring about unity, ultimately through legal and coercive means. The success of this unification, however, and the ultimate fate of the Donatists is open to debate, along with virtually every other datum from this controversy. The debated nature of the controversy, therefore, needs to be closely examined, for just what paradigm one takes from the outset could make all the difference. | ||
| 601 | |a Historie | ||
| 652 | |a KAB:KBN:KDH | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a Rezension |0 (DE-588)4049712-4 |0 (DE-627)106186019 |0 (DE-576)209083166 |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4132881-4 |0 (DE-627)105684309 |0 (DE-576)209639288 |2 gnd |a Donatismus |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4179637-8 |0 (DE-627)105332143 |0 (DE-576)209992654 |2 gnd |a Schisma |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |q z |2 gnd |a Geschichte |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of ecclesiastical history |d London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1950 |g 70(2019), 3, Seite 565-569 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785375 |w (DE-600)1466476-8 |w (DE-576)078707234 |x 1469-7637 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:70 |g year:2019 |g number:3 |g pages:565-569 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Rezension von |t The donatist schism |d Liverpool : Liverpool University Press, 2016 |h viii, 394 Seiten |w (DE-627)861739361 |w (DE-576)475415256 |z 1781382816 |z 9781781382813 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-ecclesiastical-history/article/donatism-of-history-recent-questions/23165550033B38BC20112AEEA0E1A252 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022046918000702 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3507823543 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 167173520X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20231107115128 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190821||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049022 |a KBN | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736167 |a KDH | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044284 |a KAB | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Donatism,Donatist controversy,History,History,History in art,Schism,Schism,Schism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Donatisme,Histoire,Histoire,Histoire,Schisme,Schisme,Schisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Cisma,Cisma,Cisma,Donatismo,Historia,Historia,Historia |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Donatismo,Scisma,Scisma,Scisma,Storia,Storia |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 分裂,分立,历史,史,多纳徒主义,多纳图教派,多纳图主义 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 分裂,分立,多納徒主義,多納圖教派,多納圖主義,歷史,史 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Cisma,Cisma,Cisma,Donatismo,História,História |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Донатизм,История (мотив),История,Схизма (1159-1177),Схизма (1130),Схизма |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Δονατισμός,Ιστορία (μοτίβο),Ιστορία,Σχίσμα (1159-1177),Σχίσμα (1130),Σχίσμα |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Donatistenstreit , Alexandrinisches Schisma,Kirchenspaltung , History,Geschichtliche Epoche,Historical development,Historische Entwicklung,Landesgeschichte,Regionalgeschichte,Ortsgeschichte,Zeitgeschichte |