Nahmanides and Ibn Ezra's commentaries on Genesis
In this article I re-examine the question of which of Ibn Ezra's commentaries on Genesis was available to Nahmanides when he wrote his own commentary on the book. The consensus until now had been that Nahmanides was familiar with both the short commentary and the second recension. A comprehensi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Liverpool University Press
[2019]
|
| In: |
Journal of Jewish studies
Year: 2019, Volume: 70, Issue: 1, Pages: 45-67 |
| RelBib Classification: | BH Judaism HB Old Testament KAC Church history 500-1500; Middle Ages |
| Further subjects: | B
Jewish scholars
B NAHMANIDES, ca. 1194-1270 B Judaism B IBN Ezra, Abraham ben Meir, 1089-1164 B Jewish Studies |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1679491008 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200904085622.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 191023s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.18647/3396/JJS-2019 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1679491008 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1679491008 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1053311419 |0 (DE-627)789776065 |0 (DE-576)40904928X |4 aut |a Jacobs, Jonathan |d 1965- | |
| 109 | |a Jacobs, Jonathan 1965- |a Yaʿaḳobs, Yehonatan 1965- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Nahmanides and Ibn Ezra's commentaries on Genesis |c Jonathan Jacobs |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this article I re-examine the question of which of Ibn Ezra's commentaries on Genesis was available to Nahmanides when he wrote his own commentary on the book. The consensus until now had been that Nahmanides was familiar with both the short commentary and the second recension. A comprehensive analysis of Nahmanides' commentary on Genesis demonstrates that this consensus is incorrect - Nahmanides was only familiar with Ibn Ezra's short commentary. This conclusion is based on our familiarity with Nahmanides' inclusive approach to his sources, as well as specific examples which prove that Nahmanides was not familiar with the second recension (and not even the 'third approach'). | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a IBN Ezra, Abraham ben Meir, 1089-1164 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jewish scholars | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jewish Studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judaism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a NAHMANIDES, ca. 1194-1270 | |
| 652 | |a BH:HB:KAC | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of Jewish studies |d Liverpool : Liverpool University Press, 1948 |g 70(2019), 1, Seite 45-67 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341338915 |w (DE-600)2066597-0 |w (DE-576)267942427 |x 2056-6689 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:70 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:45-67 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.18647/3396/JJS-2019 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3526446830 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1679491008 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200904085622 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 191023||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044128 |a HB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043520 |a BH | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044330 |a KAC | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a BIB |a REL | ||