Hate Speech and Self-Restraint
In this article, my aim is to consider under what circumstances, and for what reasons, individuals may freely choose not to speak hatefully about others. Even if not threatened with legal sanction, why might they decide not to say something which they think they have good reason to say? My suggestio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2019]
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2019, Volume: 22, Issue: 3, Pages: 657-671 |
RelBib Classification: | NCB Personal ethics VA Philosophy ZD Psychology |
Further subjects: | B
Ethics
B Morality B Pro tanto reasons B Self-censorship B Civility B Hatred B Self-restraint |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 168088719X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20191104113723.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 191104s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-019-10004-y |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)168088719X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP168088719X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Thompson, Simon |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Hate Speech and Self-Restraint |c Simon Thompson |
264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this article, my aim is to consider under what circumstances, and for what reasons, individuals may freely choose not to speak hatefully about others. Even if not threatened with legal sanction, why might they decide not to say something which they think they have good reason to say? My suggestion will be that there are various pro tanto reasons for individuals to restrain themselves from saying what they wanted to say. To be specific, I shall argue that such reasons fall into three analytically distinct categories, which I shall describe as normative codes of civility, ethics and morality. Thus each of these codes may provide different sorts of reasons for not engaging in hate speech. My hope is that the results of this investigation may usefully inform a strategy which aims to combat such speech without resource to the law. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Civility | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Hatred | |
650 | 4 | |a Morality | |
650 | 4 | |a Pro tanto reasons | |
650 | 4 | |a Self-censorship | |
650 | 4 | |a Self-restraint | |
652 | |a NCB:VA:ZD | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 22(2019), 3, Seite 657-671 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2019 |g number:3 |g pages:657-671 |
856 | |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-019-10004-y.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-10004-y |x Resolving-System |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3536592961 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 168088719X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20191112154042 | ||
LOK | |0 008 191104||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053747 |a ZD | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052813 |a NCB | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |