A Comparison of the Views of Charles Taylor and Christian Smith on Human Nature

Sociology has been crippled by a philosophy of social science that denies the relevance of important features of reality. Charles Taylor and Christian Smith have each articulated a searching evaluation of the current deficiencies of social science, and proposed a better philosophy. Their proposal ad...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: DeWild, Dale (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford Graduate School [2017]
In: Journal of sociology and Christianity
Year: 2017, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 4-21
Further subjects:B Reality
B Morality
B Critical Realism
B Human Nature
B Empiricism
B Knowledge
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1681503190
003 DE-627
005 20230626082732.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 191108s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1681503190 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1681503190 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a DeWild, Dale  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Comparison of the Views of Charles Taylor and Christian Smith on Human Nature  |c Dale DeWild 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Sociology has been crippled by a philosophy of social science that denies the relevance of important features of reality. Charles Taylor and Christian Smith have each articulated a searching evaluation of the current deficiencies of social science, and proposed a better philosophy. Their proposal adds legitimacy, breadth, and depth to an understanding of human nature. Taylor and Smith have each also created a vigorous and profound philosophy of human nature, and each of their views of human nature has incorporated a creative philosophy of morality. Along the way they have offered radically new conceptions of human agency, social causation, culture, selfhood, truth, and reality. Their philosophies of knowledge and their philosophies of human nature are largely in agreement, but their ideas about morality are incompatible. Sociologists typically avoid thinking about philosophical differences because past attempts to resolve them have only produced inconclusive debates. Perhaps Taylor and Smith offer a more secure foundation upon which a more solid sociology can be built. This paper is an invitation to explore these possibilities. 
601 |a Smith, Christian 
650 4 |a Critical Realism 
650 4 |a Empiricism 
650 4 |a Human Nature 
650 4 |a Knowledge 
650 4 |a Morality 
650 4 |a Reality 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of sociology and Christianity  |d Dayton, TN : Oxford Graduate School, 2016  |g 7(2017), 1, Seite 4-21  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1681455196  |w (DE-600)2998419-1  |x 2572-4088  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:7  |g year:2017  |g number:1  |g pages:4-21 
856 4 0 |u https://sociologyandchristianity.org/index.php/jsc/article/view/91  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei 
936 u w |d 7  |j 2017  |e 1  |h 4-21 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3538578737 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1681503190 
LOK |0 005 20191108112655 
LOK |0 008 191108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Knowledge and scientific news