Anthropomorphism, Theatre, Epiphany: From Herodotus to Hellenistic Historians

This paper argues that, beginning with the Euripidean deus ex machina, dramatic festivals introduced a new standard into epiphanic rituals and experience. Through the scenic double énonciation, gods are seen by mythical heroes as gods, but by the Athenian spectators as costumed actors and fictive en...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Koch, Piettre Renée (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: De Gruyter [2018]
In: Archiv für Religionsgeschichte
Jahr: 2018, Band: 20, Heft: 1, Seiten: 189-209
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Herodotus ca. 485 v. Chr.-424 v. Chr. / Euripides ca. 485/480 v. Chr.-406 v.Chr. / Deus ex machina / Epiphanie / Ritus / Held / Gott / Anthropomorphismus / Hellenismus / Geschichtsschreibung
RelBib Classification:AA Religionswissenschaft
AG Religiöses Leben; materielle Religion
BE Griechisch-Römische Religionen
Online Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (Verlag)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper argues that, beginning with the Euripidean deus ex machina, dramatic festivals introduced a new standard into epiphanic rituals and experience. Through the scenic double énonciation, gods are seen by mythical heroes as gods, but by the Athenian spectators as costumed actors and fictive entities. People could scarcely believe these were ‘real' gods, but would have no doubt been impressed by the scenic machinery. Thus the Homeric theme of a hero's likeness to the gods developed into the Hellenistic theme of the godlike ruler's (or actor's) theatrical success (or deceit). So in the Athenians' Hymn to Demetrius Poliorcetes, a victorious ruler entering a city is welcomed as a better god than the gods themselves. The simultaneous rise in popularity of paradoxical stories and experiences in the Hellenistic period was grounded not in believing, but in disbelieving - a phenomenon associated with antiquarian interests, the self-publicity of religious sanctuaries, or amazed credulity. People were increasingly drawn to ‘real' gods, leading to long pilgrimages and extensive financial outlay (in the mysteries) in order to see them. I investigate this phenomenon by focusing upon fragments of the ‘mimetic' or ‘tragic' Greek historians that survive from this period.
ISSN:1868-8888
Enthält:Enthalten in: Archiv für Religionsgeschichte
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/arege-2018-0012