Paul Feyerabend: The Worst Friend of Theology?
After his death, Paul Feyerabend, the philosopher of science, was labeled, not altogether seriously, as "the worst enemy of science." He often favorably compared theologians to scientists, and yet there is little real comfort for theology in his writings. His anarchic epistemology is destr...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge
[2019]
|
In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2019, Volume: 17, Issue: 4, Pages: 469-484 |
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism CF Christianity and Science VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Feyerabend B Barth B Science B Hermeneutics |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1681627841 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20200130131722.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 191111s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14746700.2019.1670962 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1681627841 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1681627841 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1014170249 |0 (DE-627)705180735 |0 (DE-576)348388314 |4 aut |a Munchin, David | |
109 | |a Munchin, David | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Paul Feyerabend |b The Worst Friend of Theology? |c David Munchin |
264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a After his death, Paul Feyerabend, the philosopher of science, was labeled, not altogether seriously, as "the worst enemy of science." He often favorably compared theologians to scientists, and yet there is little real comfort for theology in his writings. His anarchic epistemology is destructive for any philosophical system which wishes to retain the claim that it is scientific, truth-telling, rational, and methodical. Can theology therefore withstand this anarchic challenge? | ||
601 | |a Feyerabend, Paul | ||
601 | |a Theologe | ||
650 | 4 | |a Barth | |
650 | 4 | |a Feyerabend | |
650 | 4 | |a Theology | |
650 | 4 | |a Hermeneutics | |
650 | 4 | |a Science | |
652 | |a AB:CF:VB | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Theology and science |d Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 |g 17(2019), 4, Seite 469-484 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)372546447 |w (DE-600)2124364-5 |w (DE-576)261325019 |x 1474-6719 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2019 |g number:4 |g pages:469-484 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2019.1670962 |x Resolving-System |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3539028641 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1681627841 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20200130131722 | ||
LOK | |0 008 191111||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205381X |a VB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144204389X |a CF | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Stadt Barth |