Corrigibility and Trust in the Practices of Science
In the context of crises in science, understanding what virtue in science is requires attention to virtue studies and virtue science themselves. Within and beyond the study of practices in laboratories and in scientific collaborations held up as exemplary or noted for being less so are core beliefs...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Mohr Siebeck
[2018]
|
| In: |
Philosophy, theology and the sciences
Year: 2018, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, Pages: 265-280 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCA Ethics NCJ Ethics of science |
| Further subjects: | B
Replicability crisis
B Exemplarity B Rational trust B Bayes' Theorem B Virtue science |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1682016129 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409143118.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 191118s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1628/ptsc-2018-0019 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1682016129 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1682016129 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a ger | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1060278510 |0 (DE-627)799375705 |0 (DE-576)416389228 |4 aut |a Spezio, Michael L. | |
| 109 | |a Spezio, Michael L. |a Spezio, Michael | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Corrigibility and Trust in the Practices of Science |c Michael Spezio |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In the context of crises in science, understanding what virtue in science is requires attention to virtue studies and virtue science themselves. Within and beyond the study of practices in laboratories and in scientific collaborations held up as exemplary or noted for being less so are core beliefs about what trust in science is or should be. Prevailing conceptions of trust in science and scientists are at the root of the crises in science. Virtue science and studies can help to identify the noxious tendencies of some conceptions of trust and suggest possible new ways of thinking. This article reviews evidence for sciences in crisis before drawing on Bayesian thinking to propose ways of thinking about trust, reliability, and validity in relation to science. Corrigibility, rather than fallibility, is the defining feature of science, calling for a trust in the persons, systems, and institutions of science as ever error-probable-plus-corrigible. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Bayes' Theorem | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Exemplarity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rational trust | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Replicability crisis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Virtue science | |
| 652 | |a NCA:NCJ | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Philosophy, theology and the sciences |d Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2014 |g 5(2018), 2, Seite 265-280 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)783301936 |w (DE-600)2765590-8 |w (DE-576)404297986 |x 2197-2834 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2018 |g number:2 |g pages:265-280 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1628/ptsc-2018-0019 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 354146982X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1682016129 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240528113819 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 191118||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736582 |a NCJ | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||