Contingency and Meaning-Focused Coping
This article examines the similarities and differences between a religious-philosophical approach to contingency and a (religious) psychological approach to coping with health problems. We elaborate on theoretical and empirical developments in research on coping, meaning-focused coping and religious...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
[2019]
|
In: |
Journal of empirical theology
Year: 2019, Volume: 32, Issue: 2, Pages: 281-298 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Contingency
/ Coping
/ Meaning
/ Psychology
/ Religion
|
RelBib Classification: | AE Psychology of religion RG Pastoral care ZD Psychology |
Further subjects: | B
Coping
B Contingency B Meaning |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | This article examines the similarities and differences between a religious-philosophical approach to contingency and a (religious) psychological approach to coping with health problems. We elaborate on theoretical and empirical developments in research on coping, meaning-focused coping and religious coping. Religious coping is seen as a special form of meaning-focused coping. These coping perspectives are related to Wuchterl's model for dealing with contingency and an extension of this model, based on Dutch empirical research among cancer patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-9256 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of empirical theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15709256-12341395 |