Exploring Religious Intellectual Humility and Spiritual Humility

This article explored differences between religious intellectual humility (IH), which refers to openness to different religious views and perspectives, and spiritual humility (SH), which refers to humility before God or the Sacred. In Study 1, participants completed measures of religious IH, SH, and...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of psychology and christianity
Main Author: Hodge, Adam S. ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: 2019
In: Journal of psychology and christianity
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Humility / Religion / Interfaith dialogue / Fundamentalism / Political attitude
RelBib Classification:AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
AG Religious life; material religion
AX Inter-religious relations
CB Christian life; spirituality
CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations
CG Christianity and Politics
Further subjects:B Humility
B BELIEF & doubt
B Spiritual Life
B Religious Identity
B Religious Fundamentalism
B RELIGIOUS differences
Description
Summary:This article explored differences between religious intellectual humility (IH), which refers to openness to different religious views and perspectives, and spiritual humility (SH), which refers to humility before God or the Sacred. In Study 1, participants completed measures of religious IH, SH, and several religious variables. Overall, religious IH was a positive predictor of openness to religious differences and questioning of religious beliefs, whereas SH was a positive predictor of religious fundamentalism and viewing religion as an end in itself. In Study 2, a second sample of participants completed measures of religious IH, SH, and moral foundations (Graham et al., 2011). Religious IH was a positive predictor of the moral foundations that are more consistent with liberal political values, whereas SH was a positive predictor of the moral foundations that are consistent with more conservative political values (Graham et al., 2009). We conclude by discussing limitations and suggestions for future research exploring humility and religion.
ISSN:0733-4273
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of psychology and christianity