A Call for a Permissible Plurality Within Theory-Building in a Time of Excess

Theory in a Time of Excess (Equinox 2017) serves as a useful starting point to argue for a plural understanding of theory in the study of religion. While the existing conversation often implies that there is only one acceptable way of theorizing, it seems useful to distinguish between (at least) thr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Method & theory in the study of religion
1. VerfasserIn: Hermann, Adrian 1981- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Brill [2018]
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Jahr: 2018, Band: 30, Heft: 4/5, Seiten: 487-497
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Theory in a time of excess / Religionswissenschaft / Theorie / Pluralismus
RelBib Classification:AA Religionswissenschaft
AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
AG Religiöses Leben; materielle Religion
weitere Schlagwörter:B Discourse
B Theory
B Plurality
B Religion
B Creativity
Online Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Theory in a Time of Excess (Equinox 2017) serves as a useful starting point to argue for a plural understanding of theory in the study of religion. While the existing conversation often implies that there is only one acceptable way of theorizing, it seems useful to distinguish between (at least) three understandings of theory—and a fourth potentially "illegitimate" one. These four forms (discourse theories, creative theories, scientific theories, and essentialist theories) are all present in the volume. Different theoretical approaches can learn from each other and expose their respective blind spots, which is the main reason to further a meta-theoretical debate about a permissible plurality within theory-building. Rather than a call to "just get along" under one big tent, this critical attitude implies that we should strive to better profile all four of these forms of theorizing in order to discuss their potential place in our discipline.
ISSN:1570-0682
Enthält:Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341442