There is No Teleological Suspension of the Ethical: Kierkegaard's Logic Against Religious Justification and Moral Exceptionalism

In The Book on Adler and "Does a Human Being Have the Right to Let Himself Be Put to Death for the Truth," Kierkegaard relies on logical reasoning and grammatical analysis in order to arrive at categorical normative conclusions against the use of religious belief and authority as a justifi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Section 1: Interpreting Kierkegaard: Problems and Perspectives
Main Author: Fox-Muraton, Mélissa (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: De Gruyter [2018]
In: Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
Year: 2018, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-32
RelBib Classification:FA Theology
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
NCA Ethics
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1685824234
003 DE-627
005 20240409143016.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 191217s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1515/kierke-2018-0002  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1685824234 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1685824234 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Fox-Muraton, Mélissa  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Fox-Muraton, Mélissa  |a Muraton, Mélissa Fox-  |a Fox Muraton, Mélissa 
245 1 0 |a There is No Teleological Suspension of the Ethical  |b Kierkegaard's Logic Against Religious Justification and Moral Exceptionalism  |c Mélissa Fox-Muraton 
246 1 |i Rubrikentitel  |a Section 1: Interpreting Kierkegaard: Problems and Perspectives 
264 1 |c [2018] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In The Book on Adler and "Does a Human Being Have the Right to Let Himself Be Put to Death for the Truth," Kierkegaard relies on logical reasoning and grammatical analysis in order to arrive at categorical normative conclusions against the use of religious belief and authority as a justification for ethical action. These arguments demonstrate that some types of moral knowledge can be arrived at through reason/logic, despite Kierkegaard's efforts to separate the spheres of logic and existence. Kierkegaard thereby offers a strong critique of both moral exceptionalism and an ethics of conviction, a critique which—as the paper argues—is not incompatible with his existential and Christian ethics. 
601 |a Teleologie 
601 |a Suspension 
652 |a FA:KAH:NCA:VB 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook  |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1996  |g 23(2018), 1, Seite 3-32  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)369083393  |w (DE-600)2118444-6  |w (DE-576)107015773  |x 1612-9792  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2018  |g number:1  |g pages:3-32 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/kierke.2018.23.issue-1/kierke-2018-0002/kierke-2018-0002.xml?format=INT  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2018-0002  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 356632700X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1685824234 
LOK |0 005 20210510115624 
LOK |0 008 191217||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205381X  |a VB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044020  |a FA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044624  |a KAH 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL