The begotten-not-made distinction in the eastern pro-Nicenes

The Nicene-Constantinopolitan profession that the Son of God is begotten, not made, presents the tension that the Son is caused by God but not created. This claim was a point of controversy in the semi-Arian and Eunomian/Anomean disputes of the fourth century. The latter argued that unoriginateness...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jacobs, Nathan 1977- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [2019]
In: Religious studies
Year: 2019, Volume: 55, Issue: 4, Pages: 503-535
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Council 1. (325 : Nizäa) / Symbolum Nicaenum / Arian controversy / Christology
RelBib Classification:BF Gnosticism
KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
KDF Orthodox Church
NBF Christology
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1686084447
003 DE-627
005 20200805170257.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 191219s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0034412518000069  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1686084447 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1686084447 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1026225922  |0 (DE-627)726291668  |0 (DE-576)30384079X  |4 aut  |a Jacobs, Nathan  |d 1977- 
109 |a Jacobs, Nathan 1977-  |a Jacobs, Nathan A. 1977-  |a Jacobs, Nathan Andrew 1977- 
245 1 4 |a The begotten-not-made distinction in the eastern pro-Nicenes  |c Nathan A. Jacobs 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The Nicene-Constantinopolitan profession that the Son of God is begotten, not made, presents the tension that the Son is caused by God but not created. This claim was a point of controversy in the semi-Arian and Eunomian/Anomean disputes of the fourth century. The latter argued that unoriginateness is central to divinity. Hence, the Son, being originate, cannot be of the same nature as the Father. Some philosophers of religion today echo this same conclusion. In this article, I show, contrary to both ancient and modern critics of the begotten-not-made distinction, that the Eastern fathers offer clear differences between begetting and creating, which clarify why the distinction is cogent and necessary within their metaphysics. 
652 |a BF:KAB:KDF:NBF 
689 0 0 |d f  |0 (DE-588)4032379-1  |0 (DE-627)106262076  |0 (DE-576)208996605  |2 gnd  |a Konzil  |n 1.  |d 325  |c Nizäa 
689 0 1 |d u  |0 (DE-588)4171948-7  |0 (DE-627)10539081X  |0 (DE-576)209940190  |a Symbolum Nicaenum  |2 gnd 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4196212-6  |0 (DE-627)105205826  |0 (DE-576)210106417  |2 gnd  |a Arianischer Streit 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4010141-1  |0 (DE-627)106359606  |0 (DE-576)20888615X  |2 gnd  |a Christologie 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 55(2019), 4, Seite 503-535  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:55  |g year:2019  |g number:4  |g pages:503-535 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/begottennotmade-distinction-in-the-eastern-pronicenes/121E1CFE6C5DF34638BBD1DF867FA780  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412518000069  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3567199560 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1686084447 
LOK |0 005 20200805170257 
LOK |0 008 191219||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044284  |a KAB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051787  |a NBF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043415  |a BF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442050373  |a KDF 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Arian controversy,Homoousian controversy,Christology,Symbolum Nicaenum,Nicene Creed 
STB 0 0 |a Christologie,Polémique sur l'arianisme 
STC 0 0 |a Controversias arrianas,Cristología 
STD 0 0 |a Cristologia,Disputa ariana 
STE 0 0 |a 亚流争论,阿里乌争论,基督论 
STF 0 0 |a 亞流爭論,阿里烏爭論,基督論 
STG 0 0 |a Controvérsia ariana,Cristologia 
STH 0 0 |a Арианский спор,Христология 
STI 0 0 |a Αρειανή διαμάχη,Χριστολογία 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Erstes Konzil von Nizäa,325,Nizäa,Nicaenum,1.,325,Nizäa,Nicaenum,1,325,Nizäa,Konzil von Nizäa,1.,325,Nizäa,Concilium Nicaeum,1.,325,Nizäa,Concilium Nicaenum,1.,325,Nizäa,Concilium Nicenum,1.,325,Nizäa,Ökumenisches Konzil,1.,325,Nizäa,Synodus Nicaea,1,325,Nizäa,Ecumenical Council,1.,325,Nizäa,Council of Nicaea,1.,325,Nizäa,First Council of Nicaea,787,Nizäa , Nicänisches Glaubensbekenntnis,Nicaenum,Nicänum,Nizänum