Religious Language as Symbolism

The one clear insight which can be gleaned from the discussions of religious language by both theologians and philosophers is that its reference is to the transcendent. This is almost axiomatic in Philosophy of Religion nowadays, and we feel that the remarks of Milton's archangel to the first m...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Thomas, John Heywood 1926- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Cambridge Univ. Press [1965]
Dans: Religious studies
Année: 1965, Volume: 1, Numéro: 1, Pages: 89-93
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1686088175
003 DE-627
005 20191219153211.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 191219s1965 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0034412500002353  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1686088175 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1686088175 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)127319328  |0 (DE-627)383379385  |0 (DE-576)296313408  |4 aut  |a Thomas, John Heywood  |d 1926- 
109 |a Thomas, John Heywood 1926-  |a Heywood Thomas, John 1926-  |a Heywood Thomas, J. 1926-  |a Thomas, J. Heywood 1926-  |a Tūmās, Ǧiy Hīywūd 1926-  |a Hīywūd Tūmās, Ǧiy 1926- 
245 1 0 |a Religious Language as Symbolism  |c J. Heywood Thomas 
264 1 |c [1965] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The one clear insight which can be gleaned from the discussions of religious language by both theologians and philosophers is that its reference is to the transcendent. This is almost axiomatic in Philosophy of Religion nowadays, and we feel that the remarks of Milton's archangel to the first man are most appropriate when he insists that all the conceptions we have of God or of the spiritual world are but inadequate symbols. Though this view has a long history, it does not seem to have been at all general in antiquity. It may be said to have begun with Plato and then to have continued through later generations in Neo-Platonism till it mingled with the Christian tradition. We can see how easily such traditions were fused when we look at the fusion of Platonism and Judaism in Philo of Alexandria. This is how he expounds the Exodus passage where Moses is allowed to see the back, but not the face, of God:Everything which is subsequent to God the virtuous man may apprehend: God alone is inapprehensible. That is to say, God is not apprehensible by direct frontal approach—for such approach would imply God's being disclosed such as He is: but He is apprehensible through the Powers which are consequent upon His being; for those Powers do not present His being, nature, essence but only His existence from the resultant effects. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 1(1965), 1, Seite 89-93  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:1965  |g number:1  |g pages:89-93 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/religious-language-as-symbolism/FF79DEC3638EEE44298076159BB43AE8  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500002353  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 1  |j 1965  |e 1  |h 89-93 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3567215299 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1686088175 
LOK |0 005 20191219151549 
LOK |0 008 191219||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL