Fact and Moral Value - a Comment on Dr Hudson's Paper

In the first part of his paper, Dr Hudson argues that the distinction between between facts and values is eroded because there are some factual statements (those of ‘institutional fact') from which moral judgments do follow; and secondly he argues that there is a non-contingent connexion betwee...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Helm, Paul 1940- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [1969]
In: Religious studies
Year: 1969, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, Pages: 140-144
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1686160518
003 DE-627
005 20240409150358.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 191220s1969 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0034412500004133  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1686160518 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1686160518 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1022394614  |0 (DE-627)716963485  |0 (DE-576)36527948X  |4 aut  |a Helm, Paul  |d 1940- 
109 |a Helm, Paul 1940- 
245 1 0 |a Fact and Moral Value - a Comment on Dr Hudson's Paper  |c Paul Helm 
264 1 |c [1969] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the first part of his paper, Dr Hudson argues that the distinction between between facts and values is eroded because there are some factual statements (those of ‘institutional fact') from which moral judgments do follow; and secondly he argues that there is a non-contingent connexion between beliefs about man and what it is intelligible to approve of or disapprove of morally. Both these conclusions are argued for tentatively and with reservation. In this comment I want to discuss three of the many issues Dr Hudson raises, and then to touch on a more general point which is at the source of my dissatisfaction with the drift of Dr Hudson's paper. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 5(1969), 2, Seite 140-144  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:1969  |g number:2  |g pages:140-144 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Hudson, W. D., 1920 -   |t Fact and Moral Value  |d 1969  |w (DE-627)168616050X 
787 0 8 |i Kritik in  |a Hudson, W. D., 1920 -   |t A Reply to Mr Helm  |d 1969  |w (DE-627)1686160526 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/fact-and-moral-valuea-comment-on-dr-hudsons-paper/740DECF2C10F9DD29A41041DD9010D6E  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500004133  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3567726048 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1686160518 
LOK |0 005 20191220114035 
LOK |0 008 191220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL