Fact and Value in Theological Ethics
Lady Oppenheimer has shown the need to preserve the richness of religious language and the language of vision if we are to talk about the reality of Christian ethics rather than some skeletal caricature of it. The problem is how to preserve such richness in the face of the astringent effect of the f...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1969]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 1969, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, Pages: 172-178 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1686160577 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409150420.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 191220s1969 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412500004194 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1686160577 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1686160577 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)127139087 |0 (DE-627)695185829 |0 (DE-576)296188336 |4 aut |a Galloway, Allan D. |d 1920-2006 | |
| 109 | |a Galloway, Allan D. 1920-2006 |a Galloway, Allan Douglas 1920-2006 |a Galloway, A. D. 1920-2006 |a Galloway, A. Douglas 1920-2006 |a Galloway, Allan 1920-2006 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Fact and Value in Theological Ethics |c A. D. Galloway |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1969] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Lady Oppenheimer has shown the need to preserve the richness of religious language and the language of vision if we are to talk about the reality of Christian ethics rather than some skeletal caricature of it. The problem is how to preserve such richness in the face of the astringent effect of the fact/value dichotomy in logic and the principle of the naturalistic fallacy'. Therefore, rather than attempt to develop or comment directly upon Lady Oppenheimer's sensitive and perceptive exposition of the richness of some Christian ethico-theological concepts I am inclined to relate it to some of the earlier papers and to make some suggestions about the kind of prolegomenon I would like to write for it. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 5(1969), 2, Seite 172-178 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:1969 |g number:2 |g pages:172-178 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Oppenheimer, Helen, 1926 - |t Christian Ethics: Christian Flourishing |d 1969 |w (DE-627)1686160569 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Oppenheimer, Helen, 1926 - |t A Note on Enthralment' |d 1969 |w (DE-627)1686160585 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/fact-and-value-in-theological-ethics/864B7FA9D8D13D7F15E9E23A8D9AB8EF |x Resolving-System |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500004194 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3567726110 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1686160577 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20191220114038 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 191220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||