The God-Man
In a recent issue of Religious Studies, G. G. O'Collins concludes his essay with a question which in his view states the classic problem of Christology': What is the ontological connection between the Logos and the human existence of Jesus of Nazareth?' In another recent issue C. J....
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1970]
|
| Dans: |
Religious studies
Année: 1970, Volume: 6, Numéro: 2, Pages: 157-173 |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | In a recent issue of Religious Studies, G. G. O'Collins concludes his essay with a question which in his view states the classic problem of Christology': What is the ontological connection between the Logos and the human existence of Jesus of Nazareth?' In another recent issue C. J. F. Williams poses the question, What sort of union is a hypostatic union?' In the literature grown up around Kierkegaard's pronouncements on the notion of the God-man, the following question is discussed: Did Kierkegaard mean to say that the very notion of the God-man is incoherent? Some hold that he did, some that he did not. Yet, however important it is to establish what Kierkegaard himself held concerning this question, there is the far more important question for Christian doctrine of whether the notion of the God-man is incoherent. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412500004406 |