The Argument from Design - a Reply to R. G. Swinburne
Of all the arguments for the existence of God, the argument from design is in many respects the most impressive, as everyone remarks that Kant remarked. Certainly it is an argument which seems to have appealed to the popular imagination and even today does not lack philosophical proponents. The purp...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1971]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 1971, Volume: 7, Issue: 4, Pages: 361-373 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1686522096 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409150459.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200107s1971 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S003441250000041X |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1686522096 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1686522096 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1147177562 |0 (DE-627)1008537934 |0 (DE-576)421107952 |4 aut |a Olding, Alan |d 1937- | |
| 109 | |a Olding, Alan 1937- |a Olding, A. 1937- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Argument from Design - a Reply to R. G. Swinburne |c A. Olding |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1971] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Of all the arguments for the existence of God, the argument from design is in many respects the most impressive, as everyone remarks that Kant remarked. Certainly it is an argument which seems to have appealed to the popular imagination and even today does not lack philosophical proponents. The purpose of the present paper is to examine a recent formulation of the argument. In particular I shall be concerned to bring into the open its dualist assumptions and to show how these militate against its general plausibility. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 7(1971), 4, Seite 361-373 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:1971 |g number:4 |g pages:361-373 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Swinburne, Richard, 1934- |t The Argument from Design, in: Philosophy |g 1968, Seite 199-200 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Swinburne, Richard, 1934 - |t The Argument from Design - a Defence |d 1972 |w (DE-627)1686651457 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/argument-from-designa-reply-to-r-g-swinburne1/0E45FCD1C3F40234A778269DA1EFB33D |x Resolving-System |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441250000041X |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3572954150 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1686522096 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200107102826 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200107||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||