Ethical Supernaturalism and the Problem of Evil

Consider the following argument (I shall call it ‘the atheist's argument') for the non-existence of God:(1) Some men are morally reprehensible for failing to perform certain actions, e.g. actions of abolishing suffering which is destructive of character.(2) Concentrate, for simplicity, jus...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dore, Clement 1930-2016 (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [1972]
In: Religious studies
Year: 1972, Volume: 8, Issue: 2, Pages: 97-113
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 168665135X
003 DE-627
005 20240409145601.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200108s1972 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S003441250000562X  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)168665135X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP168665135X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1202528139  |0 (DE-627)1686672950  |4 aut  |a Dore, Clement  |d 1930-2016 
109 |a Dore, Clement 1930-2016  |a Dore, Clement Joseph 1930-2016 
245 1 0 |a Ethical Supernaturalism and the Problem of Evil  |c Clement Dore 
264 1 |c [1972] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Consider the following argument (I shall call it ‘the atheist's argument') for the non-existence of God:(1) Some men are morally reprehensible for failing to perform certain actions, e.g. actions of abolishing suffering which is destructive of character.(2) Concentrate, for simplicity, just on actions of this latter sort. If there is an omnipotent and omniscient being, then he, too, fails to perform actions of this sort, and, hence, he is also morally reprehensible unless some such difference obtains between him and the men mentioned in (1) (call them ‘M') as his being unable to abolish this suffering, while M is able to abolish it, or his not knowing that this suffering is in fact destructive of character, while M does know this.(3) But being omnipotent and omniscient is incompatible with any such difference obtaining. (For example, being omnipotent is incompatible with being unable to abolish the suffering under discussion and being omniscient is incompatible with failing to know that a given instance of suffering which is destructive of character does in fact have that property.) 
601 |a Supernatural 
601 |a Problem 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 8(1972), 2, Seite 97-113  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:1972  |g number:2  |g pages:97-113 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/ethical-supernaturalism-and-the-problem-of-evil/AEC9E28DBD41034546B9AD04ED176FD6  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441250000562X  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3573281958 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 168665135X 
LOK |0 005 20200108090755 
LOK |0 008 200108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL