The Missing Premise in the Ontological Argument
It appears to me that most traditional criticism of the Ontological argument misses the mark because the proponents imply a premise which, if true, would validate their argument on precisely the point attacked by the opponents. In view of this possibility, I propose the following analysis:(1) state...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1973]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 1973, Volume: 9, Issue: 3, Pages: 289-296 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1686651805 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200108090817.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200108s1973 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S003441250000679X |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1686651805 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1686651805 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)141479752 |0 (DE-627)629424993 |0 (DE-576)166467294 |4 aut |a Geisler, Norman L. |d 1932-2019 | |
| 109 | |a Geisler, Norman L. 1932-2019 |a Geisler, Norm 1932-2019 |a Geisler, Norman 1932-2019 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Missing Premise in the Ontological Argument |c Norman L. Geisler |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1973] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a It appears to me that most traditional criticism of the Ontological argument misses the mark because the proponents imply a premise which, if true, would validate their argument on precisely the point attacked by the opponents. In view of this possibility, I propose the following analysis:(1) state the traditional ontological argument without the implied premise;(2) state the traditional criticisms, showing how they miss the mark;(3) restate the ontological argument with the implied premise made clear;(4) offer a defence of the implied premise;(5) show how the ontological argument is still invalidated by another criticism;(6) argue that the only way to avoid this other criticism is to borrow another premise from the cosmological argument, and(7) that when these premises are borrowed the result is a valid form of the cosmological argument for the existence of a necessary being. | ||
| 601 | |a Ontologie | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 9(1973), 3, Seite 289-296 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:1973 |g number:3 |g pages:289-296 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/missing-premise-in-the-ontological-argument/29B4696F37BA66A6198DE7D883D78CA7 |x Resolving-System |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441250000679X |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3573282431 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1686651805 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200108090817 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||