Foreknowledge and Fatalism

In a recent book, J. R. Lucas presents an argument to show that if God has infallible knowledge of the future, our will is not free. Thus, Lucas concludes, like the medieval Jewish philosopher Gersonides, that God in creating beings with genuinely free will, abdicates some of his omniscience as well...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Purtill, Richard Lawrence 1931-2016 (Author)
Contributors: Lucas, John R. (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [1974]
In: Religious studies
Year: 1974, Volume: 10, Issue: 3, Pages: 319-324
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1686718330
003 DE-627
005 20240409143349.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200108s1974 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S003441250000768X  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1686718330 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1686718330 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)172315425  |0 (DE-627)697223345  |0 (DE-576)133181812  |4 aut  |a Purtill, Richard Lawrence  |d 1931-2016 
109 |a Purtill, Richard Lawrence 1931-2016  |a Purtill, Richard L. 1931-2016 
245 1 0 |a Foreknowledge and Fatalism  |c Richard L. Purtill 
264 1 |c [1974] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In a recent book, J. R. Lucas presents an argument to show that if God has infallible knowledge of the future, our will is not free. Thus, Lucas concludes, like the medieval Jewish philosopher Gersonides, that God in creating beings with genuinely free will, abdicates some of his omniscience as well as some of his omnipotence. God could, but will not, determine our choices, since such an exercise of his power would rob us of free will. Similarly, Lucas holds, God could but does not foreknow our future choices since this also would rob us of free will. This argument, from so formidable a foe of determinism as Lucas, merits our most serious attention. However, I believe that there is a way to evade its conclusion, a way which Lucas considers but rejects (in my view too hastily). 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |0 (DE-627)1232045675  |0 (DE-576)162045670  |4 ant  |a Lucas, John R. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 10(1974), 3, Seite 319-324  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:1974  |g number:3  |g pages:319-324 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/foreknowledge-and-fatalism/F3C65B4BF4FEA0BAB3A81C991D6A78BE  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441250000768X  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3573423280 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1686718330 
LOK |0 005 20200108160825 
LOK |0 008 200108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL