Jonathan Edwards and H. Richard Niebuhr

Martin E. Marty, in his foreword to a volume on the thought of the late H. Richard Niebuhr, offered the comment, ‘I wonder whether since Jonathan Edwards there has been a systematic theologian of such organizing brilliance as H. Richard Niebuhr.'1 Marty's judgement that Niebuhr shares with...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Religious studies
Main Author: Sandon, Leo (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [1976]
In: Religious studies
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1686959907
003 DE-627
005 20240409143318.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200109s1976 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0034412500009033  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1686959907 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1686959907 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1202578632  |0 (DE-627)1686961049  |4 aut  |a Sandon, Leo 
109 |a Sandon, Leo 
245 1 0 |a Jonathan Edwards and H. Richard Niebuhr  |c Leo Sandon 
264 1 |c [1976] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Martin E. Marty, in his foreword to a volume on the thought of the late H. Richard Niebuhr, offered the comment, ‘I wonder whether since Jonathan Edwards there has been a systematic theologian of such organizing brilliance as H. Richard Niebuhr.'1 Marty's judgement that Niebuhr shares with Edwards a significant position in the American theological tradition is particularly suggestive when one is aware of Niebuhr's indebtedness to Edwards in his own constructive theological programme. One of the most precarious exercises in the writing of intellectual history is that of demonstrating the ‘influence' of one thinker upon another. Unless there is an explicit citation or a confession of dependence upon the thought of a mentor in the writings of a theologian, the lines of influence are elusive and difficult to establish. It is therefore more prudent and manageable to speak of ‘similarities' of thought or the ‘possibility' of influence. Nevertheless the author of this study is convinced of the importance of Edwardsean influence on Niebuhr. 
601 |a Edwards, Jonathan 
601 |a Richard 
601 |a Niebuhr, Richard R. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 12(1976), 1, Seite 101-115  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:1976  |g number:1  |g pages:101-115 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/jonathan-edwards-and-h-richard-niebuhr/D9C386ED9E525CC2F4FF4A1241906316  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500009033  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3573620426 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1686959907 
LOK |0 005 20200109170619 
LOK |0 008 200109||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL