Otto and Numinous Experience

The basic position of Otto in The Idea of the Holy2 may be stated as follows:All religions involve and rest on experience of the numinous, which affords a positive knowledge of the central object of religion - God. This position is what may be called a Theory of Religion: like Freud's explanati...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bastow, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [1976]
In: Religious studies
Year: 1976, Volume: 12, Issue: 2, Pages: 159-176
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1686959931
003 DE-627
005 20200110091314.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200109s1976 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0034412500009148  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1686959931 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1686959931 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1202468381  |0 (DE-627)1686516908  |4 aut  |a Bastow, David 
109 |a Bastow, David 
245 1 0 |a Otto and Numinous Experience  |c David Bastow 
264 1 |c [1976] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The basic position of Otto in The Idea of the Holy2 may be stated as follows:All religions involve and rest on experience of the numinous, which affords a positive knowledge of the central object of religion - God. This position is what may be called a Theory of Religion: like Freud's explanation of religion in terms of father figures, and Durkheim's claim that religion is society's celebration of itself, it claims to give an explanation of the phenomenon of religion - the fact that men belong to religions etc. Unlike some of its rivals, this Theory of Religion does not explain religion away; the explanation is intended to be compatible with religious belief; the explanatory concepts are supposed to be concepts from within religion. If Otto had just argued that religion was, or some religions were, true, his claims would have been only of theological interest. But what makes his writings especially important is that he looks at religion not merely as a theologian, but also as a phenomenologist; he is concerned to explain religion and religions as they are; even to explain the diversity of religions (with a version of evolutionism). It would be over-simple, but not entirely wide of the truth, to say that he first looks at religions in the sensitive but neutral manner of the phenomenologist, to decide what are the central phenomena of religion; and then puts forward a theological explanation of these phenomena. At least, this is what for much of his book he aims to do. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 12(1976), 2, Seite 159-176  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:1976  |g number:2  |g pages:159-176 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/otto-and-numinous-experience1/C5708FE5A3534860EB017D9CC3B52F5D  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500009148  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3573620450 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1686959931 
LOK |0 005 20200109170620 
LOK |0 008 200109||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL