A Death-Blow to Śaṅkara's Non-Dualism? A Dualist Refutation
Many of us, and I am no exception, have been led to assume, almost un-consciously, that Sankara is India's greatest philosopher and that the non-dualist philosophy he consolidated, Advaita Vedānta, is the supreme spiritual philosophy of India, if not of the whole world. Dualist (Dvaita) opponen...
| Published in: | Religious studies |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1976]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 1976, Volume: 12, Issue: 3, Pages: 281-290 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1686960026 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200110094843.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200109s1976 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412500009379 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1686960026 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1686960026 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1029174946 |0 (DE-627)732553040 |0 (DE-576)377055972 |4 aut |a Betty, L. Stafford |d 1942- | |
| 109 | |a Betty, L. Stafford 1942- |a Betty, Lewis Stafford 1942- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Death-Blow to Śaṅkara's Non-Dualism? A Dualist Refutation |c L. Stafford Betty |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1976] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Many of us, and I am no exception, have been led to assume, almost un-consciously, that Sankara is India's greatest philosopher and that the non-dualist philosophy he consolidated, Advaita Vedānta, is the supreme spiritual philosophy of India, if not of the whole world. Dualist (Dvaita) opponents like Madhva, on the other hand, have usually been appreciated very little, if at all. Several of my colleagues think of Madhva as a reactionary, if brilliant, theist whose philosophy best serves as a foil to Sankara's. Madhva, it almost seems, is studied not for his own philosophical virtues but as a means the better to appreciate Sankara's. I believe that we must weigh more carefully the dualist position, particularly its trenchant critique of non-dualism. We may discover in the process that Sankara, whatever else he was - brilliant stylist, mystic par excellence, deft polemicist - was not the originator or consolidator of anything like an internally consistent metaphysics. | ||
| 601 | |a Śaṅkara | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 12(1976), 3, Seite 281-290 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:1976 |g number:3 |g pages:281-290 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/deathblow-to-sankaras-nondualism-a-dualist-refutation/422BF1E9208AE8BCE550E023D5F5A3CD |x Resolving-System |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500009379 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 12 |j 1976 |e 3 |h 281-290 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3573620531 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1686960026 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200109170624 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200109||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||