A Death-Blow to Śaṅkara's Non-Dualism? A Dualist Refutation

Many of us, and I am no exception, have been led to assume, almost un-consciously, that Sankara is India's greatest philosopher and that the non-dualist philosophy he consolidated, Advaita Vedānta, is the supreme spiritual philosophy of India, if not of the whole world. Dualist (Dvaita) opponen...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Religious studies
Auteur principal: Betty, L. Stafford 1942- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Cambridge Univ. Press [1976]
Dans: Religious studies
Année: 1976, Volume: 12, Numéro: 3, Pages: 281-290
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:Many of us, and I am no exception, have been led to assume, almost un-consciously, that Sankara is India's greatest philosopher and that the non-dualist philosophy he consolidated, Advaita Vedānta, is the supreme spiritual philosophy of India, if not of the whole world. Dualist (Dvaita) opponents like Madhva, on the other hand, have usually been appreciated very little, if at all. Several of my colleagues think of Madhva as a reactionary, if brilliant, theist whose philosophy best serves as a foil to Sankara's. Madhva, it almost seems, is studied not for his own philosophical virtues but as a means the better to appreciate Sankara's. I believe that we must weigh more carefully the dualist position, particularly its trenchant critique of non-dualism. We may discover in the process that Sankara, whatever else he was - brilliant stylist, mystic par excellence, deft polemicist - was not the originator or consolidator of anything like an internally consistent metaphysics.
ISSN:1469-901X
Contient:Enthalten in: Religious studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0034412500009379