Religious Experience and Rational Certainty

The purpose of this paper is to clear up the long-standing veritable mountain of misinterpretation, perpetuated from critic to critic, concerning the admittedly problematic concept of self-authenticating (i.e. unmistakable) religious experience. While it may well be the case, as many have argued, th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Religious studies
Main Author: Oakes, Robert A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [1976]
In: Religious studies
Year: 1976, Volume: 12, Issue: 3, Pages: 311-318
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1686960050
003 DE-627
005 20200110092802.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200109s1976 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0034412500009409  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1686960050 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1686960050 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1202521231  |0 (DE-627)1686660383  |4 aut  |a Oakes, Robert A. 
109 |a Oakes, Robert A.  |a Oakes, Robert  |a Oakes, R. A.  |a Oakes, Robert Aaron 
245 1 0 |a Religious Experience and Rational Certainty  |c Robert A. Oakes 
264 1 |c [1976] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The purpose of this paper is to clear up the long-standing veritable mountain of misinterpretation, perpetuated from critic to critic, concerning the admittedly problematic concept of self-authenticating (i.e. unmistakable) religious experience. While it may well be the case, as many have argued, that a sort of ‘experience' about which one could not be mistaken is simply a logically impossible state of affairs, this cannot be known to be the case so long as what is under attack is (as I hope to show) a bogus concept, obviously absurd, having nothing whatsoever to do with the correct interpretation of ‘self-authentication'. Hence, my mission herein is essentially that of philosophical analysis or clarification of meaning. Only upon suitable clarification of this concept will we be in a position to consider the question of its possible application, i.e. whether or not there could be an instantiation of such experience. I might point out that my central concern is somewhat more explicatory than historical, though I believe that the account developed in this paper is essentially congenial with the intent of those who have been proponents of the view that there can be self-authenticating religious experience. Let us begin, then, by turning to some representative criticism of the concept in question. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 12(1976), 3, Seite 311-318  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:1976  |g number:3  |g pages:311-318 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/religious-experience-and-rational-certainty/30D5A11F2EE9B4DC978DC658BCFF3B81  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500009409  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 12  |j 1976  |e 3  |h 311-318 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3573620566 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1686960050 
LOK |0 005 20200109170626 
LOK |0 008 200109||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL