Religious Experience and Rational Certainty
The purpose of this paper is to clear up the long-standing veritable mountain of misinterpretation, perpetuated from critic to critic, concerning the admittedly problematic concept of self-authenticating (i.e. unmistakable) religious experience. While it may well be the case, as many have argued, th...
Published in: | Religious studies |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1976]
|
In: |
Religious studies
Year: 1976, Volume: 12, Issue: 3, Pages: 311-318 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1686960050 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20200110092802.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200109s1976 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412500009409 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1686960050 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1686960050 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1202521231 |0 (DE-627)1686660383 |4 aut |a Oakes, Robert A. | |
109 | |a Oakes, Robert A. |a Oakes, Robert |a Oakes, R. A. |a Oakes, Robert Aaron | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religious Experience and Rational Certainty |c Robert A. Oakes |
264 | 1 | |c [1976] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The purpose of this paper is to clear up the long-standing veritable mountain of misinterpretation, perpetuated from critic to critic, concerning the admittedly problematic concept of self-authenticating (i.e. unmistakable) religious experience. While it may well be the case, as many have argued, that a sort of experience' about which one could not be mistaken is simply a logically impossible state of affairs, this cannot be known to be the case so long as what is under attack is (as I hope to show) a bogus concept, obviously absurd, having nothing whatsoever to do with the correct interpretation of self-authentication'. Hence, my mission herein is essentially that of philosophical analysis or clarification of meaning. Only upon suitable clarification of this concept will we be in a position to consider the question of its possible application, i.e. whether or not there could be an instantiation of such experience. I might point out that my central concern is somewhat more explicatory than historical, though I believe that the account developed in this paper is essentially congenial with the intent of those who have been proponents of the view that there can be self-authenticating religious experience. Let us begin, then, by turning to some representative criticism of the concept in question. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 12(1976), 3, Seite 311-318 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:1976 |g number:3 |g pages:311-318 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/religious-experience-and-rational-certainty/30D5A11F2EE9B4DC978DC658BCFF3B81 |x Resolving-System |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500009409 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 12 |j 1976 |e 3 |h 311-318 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3573620566 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1686960050 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20200109170626 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200109||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |