White Privilege and the Erroneous Conscience: Rethinking Moral Culpability and Ignorance
This paper considers the problems that unconscious racial bias and social sin more broadly pose for moral theology's concepts of the erroneous conscience and ignorance. It argues that systemic racism prompts us to reimagine the erroneous conscience and individual culpability for ignorance. I ar...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Philosophy Documentation Center
[2019]
|
| In: |
Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 39, Issue: 2, Pages: 357-374 |
| RelBib Classification: | AE Psychology of religion KDB Roman Catholic Church NBE Anthropology NCC Social ethics |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1687507201 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210301104707.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200116s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1687507201 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1687507201 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Block, Elizabeth Sweeny |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a White Privilege and the Erroneous Conscience |b Rethinking Moral Culpability and Ignorance |c Elizabeth Sweeny Block |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper considers the problems that unconscious racial bias and social sin more broadly pose for moral theology's concepts of the erroneous conscience and ignorance. It argues that systemic racism prompts us to reimagine the erroneous conscience and individual culpability for ignorance. I argue that the erroneous conscience is useful in protecting human dignity in the face of error and in acknowledging the many ways we err but also problematic because it equates error with concrete action and conscious decisions and does not account for responsibility for social sin. This paper asserts that people of privilege and white persons cannot be morally innocent, but the erroneous conscience as it has been understood in the theological tradition often implies that innocence is the goal of the moral life and only holds us accountable for conscious moral actions. | ||
| 601 | |a Privileg | ||
| 601 | |a conscience | ||
| 652 | |a AE:KDB:NBE:NCC | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Society of Christian Ethics |t Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics |d Charlottesville, Virgina : Philosophy Documentation Center, 2002 |g 39(2019), 2, Seite 357-374 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)618796118 |w (DE-600)2538854-X |w (DE-576)325341176 |x 2326-2176 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:39 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g pages:357-374 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://muse.jhu.edu/article/741508 |x Resolving-System |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 357577188X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1687507201 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210301104707 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200116||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2020-02-28#56A2DB5DBB075A27FA3B5C662BBF6F56DC8B956E | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049839 |a KDB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043024 |a AE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205283X |a NCC | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||