The coherence of equivocal penal substitution: modern and scholastic voices
In this contribution we investigate the conceptual coherence of penal substitution and its moral validity. After assessing two opposing modern contributions (Stevin Porter and Mark Murphy), we turn to Reformed and medieval scholasticism (Owen, Van Mastricht, and Duns Scotus). This scholastic manoeuv...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
[2019]
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 86, Issue: 3, Pages: 227-241 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Murphy, Mark C. 1968-
/ Porter, Steven L. 1970-
/ Sin
/ Punishment
/ Forgiveness of sins
/ Scholasticism
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBE Anthropology |
Further subjects: | B
Owen
B Coherence B Scholasticism B Scotus B Representative deservedness B Penal Substitution |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |