Working, across the Very Long Reformation: Four Models
There are few matters of such moment in any given culture as the relation of deserving and reward. Understand a given culture's system of reward, and you understand that culture's structure and values. How, then, could both Liberalism and left-wing historians have been so wrong, for so lon...
| Publié dans: | Reformation |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Reformation
Année: 2019, Volume: 24, Numéro: 2, Pages: 181-194 |
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions CD Christianisme et culture KAG Réforme; humanisme; Renaissance KAH Époque moderne KDD Église protestante KDE Église anglicane NBK Sotériologie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Tisserands
B Gaskell B Calvinism B Lutheranism B Semi-Pelagianism B Arminianism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | There are few matters of such moment in any given culture as the relation of deserving and reward. Understand a given culture's system of reward, and you understand that culture's structure and values. How, then, could both Liberalism and left-wing historians have been so wrong, for so long, about the way Reformation theology defined works and merit? In this essay I define the error and then suggest four non-exclusive ways we might understand it. The error is (i) a misunderstanding of Weber's thesis about Protestantism and working; (ii) a failure to understand the relation of Lutheran and Calvinist soteriology in relation to its pre-Reformation counterpart; (iii) a refusal by literary critics to recognize the full range of soteriological positions in the English Reformation; and (iv) the result of nineteenth-century Whig transformation of Reformation culture. Here my focus is Elizabeth's Gaskell's North and South. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1752-0738 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Reformation
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13574175.2019.1665284 |