In Defence of the Epistemological Objection to Divine Command Theory

Divine command theories (DCTs) come in several different forms but at their core all of these theories claim that certain moral statuses (most typically the status of being obligatory) exist in virtue of the fact that God has commanded them to exist. Several authors argue that this core version of t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sophia
Main Author: Danaher, John 1967- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands [2019]
In: Sophia
Year: 2019, Volume: 58, Issue: 3, Pages: 381-400
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
NCA Ethics
Further subjects:B Divine Command Theory
B Epistemology
B Moral uncertainty
B Metaethics
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1688638547
003 DE-627
005 20240409135604.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200128s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11841-017-0622-9  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1688638547 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1688638547 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1031899413  |0 (DE-627)737511834  |0 (DE-576)37959949X  |4 aut  |a Danaher, John  |d 1967- 
109 |a Danaher, John 1967- 
245 1 0 |a In Defence of the Epistemological Objection to Divine Command Theory  |c John Danaher 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Divine command theories (DCTs) come in several different forms but at their core all of these theories claim that certain moral statuses (most typically the status of being obligatory) exist in virtue of the fact that God has commanded them to exist. Several authors argue that this core version of the DCT is vulnerable to an epistemological objection. According to this objection, DCT is deficient because certain groups of moral agents lack epistemic access to God's commands. But there is confusion as to the precise nature and significance of this objection, and critiques of its key premises. In this article, I try to clear up this confusion and address these critiques. I do so in three ways. First, I offer a simplified general version of the objection. Second, I address the leading criticisms of the premises of this objection, focusing in particular on the role of moral risk/uncertainty in our understanding of God's commands. And third, I outline four possible interpretations of the argument, each with a differing degree of significance for the proponent of the DCT. 
650 4 |a Divine Command Theory 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
650 4 |a Metaethics 
650 4 |a Moral uncertainty 
652 |a AB:NBC:NCA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 58(2019), 3, Seite 381-400  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:58  |g year:2019  |g number:3  |g pages:381-400 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/DANIDO-7.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-017-0622-9  |x Resolving-System 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3582833011 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1688638547 
LOK |0 005 20200701154612 
LOK |0 008 200128||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL