Consistent Liberalism does not Require Active Euthanasia

I argue that ‘classical liberalism' does not sanction any easy permissiveness about suicide and active euthanasia. I will use liberal arguments to argue that the distinction between active and passive euthanasia is real and that assisted suicide is, at the very least, deeply troubling when view...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Groarke, Louis (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2019]
In: Heythrop journal
Year: 2019, Volume: 60, Issue: 6, Pages: 895-909
RelBib Classification:NCH Medical ethics
TJ Modern history
TK Recent history
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1688801146
003 DE-627
005 20210813150219.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200129s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/heyj.13014  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1688801146 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1688801146 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Groarke, Louis  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Consistent Liberalism does not Require Active Euthanasia  |c Louis Groarke 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a I argue that ‘classical liberalism' does not sanction any easy permissiveness about suicide and active euthanasia. I will use liberal arguments to argue that the distinction between active and passive euthanasia is real and that assisted suicide is, at the very least, deeply troubling when viewed from an authentic liberal perspective. The usual argument for active euthanasia is a utilitarian, not a liberal argument, as recent calls to eliminate the conscientious objection rights of doctors who refuse participation in such procedures plainly demonstrate. The paper focuses on arguments in the public sphere (such as those articulated by James Rachels). 
652 |a NCH:TJ:TK:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Heythrop journal  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960  |g 60(2019), 6, Seite 895-909  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320573052  |w (DE-600)2016721-0  |w (DE-576)094425485  |x 1468-2265  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:60  |g year:2019  |g number:6  |g pages:895-909 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/heyj.13014  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.13014  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3583136845 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1688801146 
LOK |0 005 20220308121346 
LOK |0 008 200129||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053909  |a TJ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053887  |a TK 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL