Disagreeing with a Skeptic from a Contextualist Point of View
The paper focuses on the problem of how to account for the phenomena of disagreement and retraction in disputes over skepticism in a contextualist framework. I will argue that nonindexical versions of contextualism are better suited to account for those phenomena than DeRose's indexical form of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2020, Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 28-43 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Epistemological contextualism
/ Scepticism
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
(faultless) disagreement
B Book review B single-scoreboard semantics B Skepticism B argument form ignorance B Contextualism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1691959391 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409123520.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200310s2020 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-20191360 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1691959391 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1691959391 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)136164676 |0 (DE-627)577203827 |0 (DE-576)16430522X |4 aut |a Brendel, Elke |d 1962- | |
| 109 | |a Brendel, Elke 1962- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Disagreeing with a Skeptic from a Contextualist Point of View |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The paper focuses on the problem of how to account for the phenomena of disagreement and retraction in disputes over skepticism in a contextualist framework. I will argue that nonindexical versions of contextualism are better suited to account for those phenomena than DeRose's indexical form of contextualism. Furthermore, I will argue against DeRose's "single scoreboard" semantics and against his solution of ruling that in a dispute over skepticism, both parties to the conversation are expressing something truth-valueless. At the end, I will briefly address the question of whether DeRose's contextualism combined with his double-safety account and his rule of sensitivity provide an epistemically satisfying answer to the skeptical challenge. It will be argued that by merely explaining (away) the attractiveness of skeptical arguments, DeRose's contextualism seems to lack the resources to explain some important epistemic issues, as, for example, the question of what knowledge is and when a true belief turns into knowledge. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a (faultless) disagreement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a argument form ignorance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Contextualism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a single-scoreboard semantics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Skepticism | |
| 652 | |a AB:VA | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a Rezension |0 (DE-588)4049712-4 |0 (DE-627)106186019 |0 (DE-576)209083166 |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4998367-2 |0 (DE-627)504487566 |0 (DE-576)253204305 |2 gnd |a Epistemologischer Kontextualismus |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4055225-1 |0 (DE-627)104213140 |0 (DE-576)209112794 |2 gnd |a Skeptizismus |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |0 (DE-588)139786449 |0 (DE-627)613103564 |0 (DE-576)181006677 |4 ant |a DeRose, Keith |d 1962- | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 10(2020), 1, Seite 28-43 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:28-43 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a DeRose, Keith, 1962 - |t Replies to Commentators |d 2020 |w (DE-627)1691959413 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/10/1/article-p28_28.xml |x Resolving-System |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-20191360 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3605538614 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1691959391 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200616181457 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200310||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Epistemological contextualism,Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Contextualisme épistémologique,Scepticisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Contextualismo epistemológico,Escepticismo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Contestualismo epistemologico,Scetticismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 怀疑主义,怀疑论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 懷疑主義,懷疑論 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ceticismo,Contextualismo epistemológico |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Скептицизм,Эпистемологический контекстуализм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Επιστημολογικός συγκειμενισμός,Σκεπτικισμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Kontextualismus , Skepsis,Skeptik |