Disagreeing with a Skeptic from a Contextualist Point of View
The paper focuses on the problem of how to account for the phenomena of disagreement and retraction in disputes over skepticism in a contextualist framework. I will argue that nonindexical versions of contextualism are better suited to account for those phenomena than DeRose's indexical form of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2020, Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 28-43 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Epistemological contextualism
/ Scepticism
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
(faultless) disagreement
B Book review B single-scoreboard semantics B Skepticism B argument form ignorance B Contextualism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |