Church-EU Dialogue under Article 17.3: Consensus-Seeking Instrument or Power Strategy?
In 2005, the European Commission formally inaugurated a "structured dialogue" between European institutions and major faith traditions and non-confessional bodies in Europe. The provision for dialogue was envisaged ostensibly as a mechanism to include religious and non-confessional perspec...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2014]
|
In: |
Politics and religion
Year: 2014, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 148-176 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | In 2005, the European Commission formally inaugurated a "structured dialogue" between European institutions and major faith traditions and non-confessional bodies in Europe. The provision for dialogue was envisaged ostensibly as a mechanism to include religious and non-confessional perspectives in the ongoing construction of the wider European project. The language of "dialogue," consensus-seeking, and mutual learning dominates both religious and political justification for this formalized provision. Analysis considers emerging praxis in the intervening period (2005-2010) to determine the extent to which consensus-seeking has prevailed over the role of power and interests. Findings indicate that a number of elements relative to the configuration of dialogue praxis have severely inhibited the communicative potential of the provision enshrined in Article 17. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1755-0491 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Politics and religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S1755048313000424 |