Robert C. Neville: A Systematic, Nonconformist, Comparative Philosopher of Religion

Neville's comparative study of religion cannot be neatly categorized into current divisions of human knowledge of religion. Its comparative method of vague categories remains hospitable to varying scholarly interests. With the help of this methodology, Neville contributes in a sui generis fashi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Song, Bin (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Illinois Press [2019]
In: American journal of theology & philosophy
Year: 2019, Volume: 40, Issue: 3, Pages: 11-30
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AX Inter-religious relations
BM Chinese universism; Confucianism; Taoism
CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations
TK Recent history
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1693501430
003 DE-627
005 20200608101049.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200330s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5406/amerjtheophil.40.3.0011  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1693501430 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1693501430 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1135196915  |0 (DE-627)890184690  |0 (DE-576)489692966  |4 aut  |a Song, Bin 
109 |a Song, Bin  |a Bin, Song  |a Bin Song 
245 1 0 |a Robert C. Neville  |b A Systematic, Nonconformist, Comparative Philosopher of Religion 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Neville's comparative study of religion cannot be neatly categorized into current divisions of human knowledge of religion. Its comparative method of vague categories remains hospitable to varying scholarly interests. With the help of this methodology, Neville contributes in a sui generis fashion to the Christian-Ru transcendence debate. An analysis of these three aspects of Neville's work supports reflection upon the nature and future of comparative study of religion. 
601 |a Neville, Robert C. 
601 |a Systematik 
601 |a Philosophie 
601 |a Religion 
652 |a AB:AX:BM:CC:TK 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American journal of theology & philosophy  |d Champaign, Ill. : Univ. of Illinois Press, 1980  |g 40(2019), 3, Seite 11-30  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)61879493X  |w (DE-600)2538655-4  |w (DE-576)318814447  |x 2156-4795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:40  |g year:2019  |g number:3  |g pages:11-30 
787 0 8 |i Kritik in  |a Neville, Robert C., 1939 -   |t A Response to the End of the Bob Era  |d 2019  |w (DE-627)1693501503 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/article/751983  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjtheophil.40.3.0011  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3615722817 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1693501430 
LOK |0 005 20200608101049 
LOK |0 008 200330||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2020-04-08#8E0F8CA697406BEA3865DEF46000B168EDFA426F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043253  |a AX 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043806  |a CC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043660  |a BM 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053887  |a TK 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL