Unclarity in Reformational Thought and the Naive-Theoretical Distinction: Examining John Frame's Critique of the Amsterdam Philosophy
Students and philosophers alike often find Dooyeweerd's writings unclear and inaccessible, and the ideas expressed in them obscure and difficult to grasp. In this paper I will first explore the issue of unclarity in Dooyeweerd's work—for example, what makes Dooyeweerdian writings difficult...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
In: |
Philosophia reformata
Year: 2020, Volume: 85, Issue: 1, Pages: 43-65 |
RelBib Classification: | TK Recent history VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
John Frame
B Herman Dooyeweerd B naive experience B theoretical thought |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1693666561 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20200401084047.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200401s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/23528230-08501003 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1693666561 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1693666561 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Berger, Mathanja |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Unclarity in Reformational Thought and the Naive-Theoretical Distinction |b Examining John Frame's Critique of the Amsterdam Philosophy |
264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Students and philosophers alike often find Dooyeweerd's writings unclear and inaccessible, and the ideas expressed in them obscure and difficult to grasp. In this paper I will first explore the issue of unclarity in Dooyeweerd's work—for example, what makes Dooyeweerdian writings difficult to understand? Why is it that his meaning is often unclear? And does this imply that something is (philosophically) wrong with his writings? Second, and as a case in point regarding unclarity in Dooyeweerd's work, I will examine an important distinction drawn in Reformational philosophy, namely, between naive experience and theoretical thinking. In his paper "The Amsterdam Philosophy: A Preliminary Critique," philosopher and theologian John Frame criticizes Dooyeweerd for his unclear writings and for drawing an implausibly sharp distinction between naive experience and theoretical thinking. Assessing Frame's critique will serve as a framework for the discussion of these two related issues. | ||
601 | |a Amsterdam | ||
601 | |a Philosophie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Herman Dooyeweerd | |
650 | 4 | |a John Frame | |
650 | 4 | |a naive experience | |
650 | 4 | |a theoretical thought | |
652 | |a TK:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Philosophia reformata |d Leiden : Brill, 1936 |g 85(2020), 1, Seite 43-65 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)618327223 |w (DE-600)2537669-X |w (DE-576)354444204 |x 2352-8230 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:85 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:43-65 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/phir/85/1/article-p43_43.xml |x Verlag |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/23528230-08501003 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3616963591 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1693666561 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20200909214415 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200401||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053887 |a TK | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |