Das Individuelle verstehen: Anmerkungen zu Vittorio Hösles "Kritik der verstehenden Vernunft"
The article comments on Vittorio Hösle’s book Kritik der verstehenden Vernunft: Eine Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften. It is a major achievement of the book to bring hermeneutical humanities and a strict conceptual philosophy closer together again. Hösle shows that a transcendental reflection o...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Review |
Langue: | Allemand |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Herder
[2020]
|
Dans: |
Theologie und Philosophie
Année: 2020, Volume: 95, Numéro: 1, Pages: 93-102 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Compréhension
/ Sciences humaines
|
RelBib Classification: | NBE Anthropologie VA Philosophie ZA Sciences sociales |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Compte-rendu de lecture
|
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | The article comments on Vittorio Hösle’s book Kritik der verstehenden Vernunft: Eine Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften. It is a major achievement of the book to bring hermeneutical humanities and a strict conceptual philosophy closer together again. Hösle shows that a transcendental reflection on hermeneutical understanding leads to fundamental philosophical problems. It is only in connection with these problems that an adequate hermeneutics can be conceptualized. The article takes a critical stand on Hösle’s rejection of hermeneutics which do not focus on noematic understanding. Hösle’s critique of German historicism seems to be especially unbalanced. This also has consequences for Hösle’s account of religion and theology, which is discussed at the end. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0040-5655 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Theologie und Philosophie
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.23769/thph-95-2020-005 |